Comparison

not just another 2FA method, but a fundamentally new security layer
that outperforms competition in both security and reliability

Authentication Methods

CRITERIA PUSH AUTHENTICATION WHATSAPP RCS SMS AXIOS LOGIC SMS OTP
Channel Mobile app + Internet WhatsApp app + Internet RCS-compatible messaging app Standard SMS Standard SMS
End-To-End Encryption App dependent (optional) Yes (between devices) Yes (but device / vendor dependent) No Yes – AES-256 E2E between sender and device
Ownership Confirmation Device ownership assumed Tied to a WhatsApp account Tied to a Google/Android device Tied to SIM (can be spoofed) Tied to SIM + hardware key on device
Coverage Limited by app presence + internet The app must be installed Not globally supported Global (any GSM network) Global (any GSM network)
Second Channel Usage No (push only) No No No Yes - extended with token verification via bank API
Device Level Protection Dependent on OS security Moderate Low / Moderate None Yes - bank-side key used to decrypt
App Dependency Yes Yes Yes (RCS apps) No Yes – app with Axios SDK
Internet Required Yes Yes Yes No No
Fraud Risk (SIM swaps, MITM) Medium (session hijack) High (account takeover) High Very high Low - SIM swaps are ineffective
Interoperability Low Low Fragmented Universal Universal
Data Retention Risk Depends on app provider WhatsApp stores metadata Dependent on the vendor High (logins, SMS content) None (stateless, no data stored)
Regulatory Compliance Requires an audit per app Not always compliant Unclear Weak (deprecated in some sectors) Designed for PSD2 / GDPR alignment
Custom Development Options Rare (cloud-based) None None None Yes – cloud or on-prem
Integration Complexity Medium/High High High Low Low (API + SDK)
User Experience Good (frictionless) Great Varied Basic (input code manually) Seamless (native SMS, decrypted automatically)